20 Ways Scientists Have Disproven The Bible & Showing It’s Origins To Be Far From What’s Commonly Stated

To start with here are 20 ways science has disproven the bible:

1. The Bible describes the earth as being stationary and the center of the universe, while science has proven that the earth is a moving planet orbiting the sun. The Bible describes the earth as being stationary in several passages, including Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and 1 Chronicles 16:30.
2. The Bible suggests that the earth is flat, while science has proven that the earth is an oblate spheroid. The Bible suggests that the earth is flat in several passages, including Isaiah 11:12, which states that “the earth will be as level as a desert plain.”
3. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring in six days, while science has shown that the universe is around 13.8 billion years old. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring in six days in the creation story in the book of Genesis.
4. The Bible suggests that the sun and stars were created on the fourth day of creation, while science has shown that the sun is around 4.6 billion years old and that the stars formed much earlier in the history of the universe. The Bible suggests that the sun and stars were created on the fourth day of creation in the book of Genesis.
5. The Bible suggests that all living things were created in their present form, while science has shown that living things have evolved over time through the process of natural selection. The Bible describes the creation of living things as occurring in their present form in the book of Genesis.
6. The Bible describes the Great Flood as a worldwide event that covered the highest mountains, while science has found no geological evidence to support the idea of a global flood. The Bible describes the Great Flood as a worldwide event that covered the highest mountains in the story of Noah’s Ark in the book of Genesis.
7. The Bible suggests that the Tower of Babel was a real event, while there is no historical or archaeological evidence to support this claim. The Bible describes the Tower of Babel as a real event in the book of Genesis.
8. The Bible describes the sun standing still in the sky as a result of Joshua’s prayer, while this event is not supported by astronomical observations. The Bible describes the sun standing still in the sky as a result of Joshua’s prayer in the book of Joshua.
9. The Bible suggests that the earth is the center of the solar system, while science has proven that the earth is just one planet orbiting the sun. The Bible suggests that the earth is the center of the solar system in several passages, including Psalm 104:5, which states that “He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.”
10. The Bible describes the earth as being suspended in space, while science has shown that the earth is held in place by gravity. The Bible describes the earth as being suspended in space in several passages, including Job 26:7, which states that “God hangs the earth on nothing.”
11. The Bible suggests that the earth has four corners, while science has proven that the earth is a sphere. The Bible suggests that the earth has four corners in several passages, including Isaiah 11:12, which states that “He will raise a banner for the nations and gather the exiles of Israel; he will assemble the scattered people of Judah from the four quarters of the earth.”
12. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring through divine intervention, while science has shown that the universe follows natural laws. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring through divine intervention in the book of Genesis.
13. The Bible suggests that the earth is young, while science has shown that the earth is around 4.5 billion years old. The Bible suggests that the earth is young in several passages, including Psalm 90:4, which states that “A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night.”
14. The Bible describes the creation of Adam and Eve as the first humans, while science has shown that human beings evolved from earlier primates. The Bible describes the creation of Adam and Eve as the first humans in the book of Genesis.
15. The Bible suggests that all living things were created by God, while science has shown that living things arose through natural processes. The Bible suggests that all living things were created by God in the book of Genesis.
16. The Bible suggests that the earth is the center of the universe, while science has shown that the earth is just one of many planets orbiting the sun. The Bible suggests that the earth is the center of the universe in several passages, including Psalm 104:5, which states that “He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.”
17. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring in six literal days, while science has shown that the universe is much older. The Bible describes the creation of the universe as occurring in six literal days in the book of Genesis.
18. The Bible suggests that the earth is stationary, while science has proven that the earth is moving through space. The Bible suggests that the earth is stationary in several passages, including Psalm 93:1, which states that “The Lord reigns, he is robed in majesty; the Lord is robed in majesty and is armed with strength. The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved.”
19. The Bible suggests that the universe was created for the benefit of humans, while science has shown that the universe is vast and complex, and that humans are just a small part of it. The Bible suggests that the universe was created for the benefit of humans in several passages, including Psalm 115:16, which states that “The highest heavens belong to the Lord, but the earth he has given to mankind.”
20. The Bible suggests that the earth is unique and separate from the rest of the universe, while science has shown that the earth is part of a larger system of planets and galaxies. The Bible suggests that the earth is unique and separate from the rest of the universe in several passages, including Deuteronomy 4:19, which states that “And when you look up to the sky and see the sun, the moon and the stars–all the heavenly array–do not be enticed into bowing down to them and worshiping things the Lord your God has apportioned to all the nations under heaven.”

There are so many religions, how can only one be true?

It is difficult to estimate how many gods are being worshipped in the world, as there are many different religions and belief systems that have their own deities. Some religions, such as Hinduism, have a pantheon of multiple gods and goddesses, while others, such as Islam and Judaism, believe in a single monotheistic deity.

Alan Watts, a British philosopher and writer, believed that the concept of gods and goddesses can be traced back to the ancient worship of natural phenomena, such as the moon and sun. In many ancient cultures, the sun and moon were seen as deities because they played a crucial role in the cycles of life, including the cycles of planting and harvest, and the passing of the seasons. The sun was often seen as a male deity, representing light, warmth, and fertility, while the moon was seen as a female deity, representing the cycles of fertility and the passage of time.

According to Watts, the ancient worship of the sun and moon can be seen as an attempt to understand and connect with the mysteries of the natural world. In many cultures, these deities were believed to have the power to influence the course of events, and people would offer prayers, sacrifices, and other forms of devotion in an attempt to appease them.

Watts also argued that the concept of gods and goddesses can be seen as a way of personifying and giving meaning to the forces of nature. By assigning human characteristics and qualities to these deities, people were able to understand and relate to them in a way that was more familiar and understandable.

However, Watts also acknowledged that the worship of gods and goddesses can also have a more practical purpose. In many societies, the worship of deities was closely tied to social and political power, and the priests and shamans who served as intermediaries between the gods and the people held a great deal of influence and authority.

Overall, the worship of gods and goddesses can be seen as a way of trying to understand and connect with the mysteries of the natural world, as well as a way of giving meaning to the forces of nature and seeking guidance and protection. It can also have a practical purpose, serving as a way of exerting social and political control and maintaining order within a society.

Did Psychedelics play a role in Christian history?

It is not uncommon for people to try to find connections between different belief systems and practices, and some people have suggested that Christian beliefs may have been influenced by the ancient worship of celestial bodies, such as the stars, moon, and sun.

In his book “The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross,” John Marco Allegro argues that the story of Jesus Christ was derived from ancient fertility cults that worshipped a sacred mushroom and saw it as a symbol of life, death, and resurrection. According to Allegro, the story of Jesus and the Christian doctrine of the resurrection may have been influenced by the use of hallucinogenic mushrooms in fertility rituals, in which participants believed that they were participating in a rebirth or resurrection.

Allegro writes: “It is clear that the early Christians, like the followers of most Eastern religions, used a variety of drugs in their religious ceremonies, and the most likely one was the mushroom.”

However, it is important to note that Allegro’s ideas have been met with skepticism and controversy within the academic community, and many scholars have rejected his theories as being unsupported by the evidence.

It is also worth noting that the worship of celestial bodies, such as the stars, moon, and sun, has a long history that predates the rise of Christianity, and it is likely that the origins of Christian beliefs and practices are more complex and multifaceted than can be explained by a single influence or source.